- Purity: recombinant production within sterile biotechnology facilities allows for a high degree of product purity and a low risk of infection.13,14
- Consistency: recombinant gonadotropin dosing is based on direct measurement of the active ingredient—a method described as, “filled by mass.” 4,6
- Chemical stability: recombinant technology has led to advances in the stability of protein-based products.15
- Production logistics: in an effort to improve efficiency, production methodologies continue to evolve towards single-use bioreactors—rather than dedicated facilities designed exclusively for a single medication.16
As in other fields of medicine, developments in biotechnology have had a significant impact on fertility care.1,2 Genetic engineering and recombinant DNA technology paved the way for industrial-scale production of complex protein molecules.2 Prior to this breakthrough, human donors were a major source of hormonal fertility treatments.3,4 Today, recombinant technology expands therapeutic options.5
An evolution to a single manufacturing method
Characteristics of recombinant and urinary medications
When prescribed as part of a fertility treatment, outcomes are generally comparable for recombinant and urinary medications.1
1. Child T et al. Front Endo. 2025;16:1536844 (1-14). 2. Bifulco M et al. EMBO Rep. 2025; 26;303-306. 3. Ebrahimi SB et al. Nat Comm. 2023;14:2411. 4. Lunenfeld B et al. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:255–263. 5. Racca A et al. Drugs. 2020;80(10):973-994. 6. Lunenfeld B et al. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:429 (1-14) 7. Capolupo A et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:9405. 8. Ezcurra D et al. Reprod Bio Endo. 2014;12:95. 9. Van de Weijer BHM et al. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003:7(5):547–557. 10. Casarini L et al. Endo Rev. 2018;39:549-592. 11. Bassett R et al. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19:300–313. 12. Leão B et al. Clinics. 2014;69:279–293. 13. Landgraf W et al. Eur Endo. 2015;12(1):1-6. 14. Liras A. Int Arch Med. 2008;1:4. 15. Jayakrishnan A et al. Sci. 2024;6:9 (1-24). 16. Jacquemart R et al. Comp Struct Biotech J. 2018;14:309-318. 17. Patki A et al. J Hum Repro Sci. 2018;11(2):1-6. 18. Anderson RC et al. Endo Rev. 2018;39:911-937. 19. Nevelli F et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:8040.








